General Introduction


Preface


Words


Sounds


Forms


Sentences

Noun phrase

Verb position

Complex clauses

Relative clauses

Verb complements

Adverbial clauses


Dialects I

Dialects II


Sociolinguistics


PDFs available in: flaggeEngland

Sentences / Syntax

Romani-Project Graz / Dieter W. Halwachs

Contrary to New Indo-Aryan languages with the verb in the final position or SOV order, Romani generally has (S)VO order in so-called neutral declarative sentences.l_5.0_01


As indicated by the brackets in the illustration 1, pronominal subjects are optional in Romani, because they are contained in the verbal ending. The position of the subject shows variance between categorical contrastive SV word order which, as in the example above, corresponds to the neutral declarative sentence, and thetic continuative VS word order, as demonstrated in the following final sequence of a Lovara fairy tale.

l_5.0_02


 

The change in the general word order from SOV to SVO is the result of Romani’s Europeanisation through contact with Greek and subsequently the languages of the Balkans. This alteration can also be seen in the dichotomy of factual and non-factual subordinating conjunctions mentioned above. Additional innovations include the relative clause, the use of prepositions and the definite article. Generally, these phenomena do not occur in the New Indo-Aryan languages on the Indian subcontinent.


NOUN PHRASE

nachobenWhite

In noun phrases, which can comprise a head NOUN (a noun or pronoun) and [OPTIONAL] constituents in a generally fixed order, the preposition is always in the initial position:


l_5.0_03

 

The following example, a prepositional phrase with a postposed noun phrase as an option extension, demonstrates all possible constituents in a noun phrase:

 

l_5.0_04

 

As shown in the example above, the noun is generally in the nominative form when following prepositions. Exceptions are the aforementioned bi ‘without’ and vaš ‘because of’, which require the genitive and dative respectively:

 

l_5.0_05

 

l_5.0_06


Contrary to the nouns, which are in the nominative form in the majority of cases and varieties, pronouns following prepositions are usually locative-marked:


l_5.0_07


Another distinctive feature of Romani is the genitive noun phrase with its “double case” where the case of the determining article correlates with the genitive attribute, which in turn correlates with the head noun in case, number and gender:

 

l_5.0_08


As shown in the introductory example, genitive nouns can also take the optional place after the head noun which does, however, not affect the “double case”. This is also demonstrated in the following example from the Lovara Romani which shows the genitive plural suffix -ger- contracted to -g-:

 

l_5.0_09

 

While the postnominal position of genitives is quasi systemic in some Romani varities, the attributes following the head noun of the noun phrase usually carry discourse-pragmatic functions:

 

l_5.0_10


Verb Position

nachobenWhite

The position of the verb depends – as shown initially – on discourse-pragmatic factors with regard to the subject. A similar, if softened, form applies to its position with regard to the object. Generally, the verb is positioned before the object – (S)VO. This applies to pronominal objects in particular: Even in Burgenland Romani, which like all other Vend varieties of the south central dialects shows a contact-induced tendency towards verbs in final positions, direct pronominal objects are usually positioned after the verb:

l_5.0_11

 

In contrast, nominal objects in Burgenland-Romani are often found in front of the verb, most likely due to the influence of Hungarian contact varieties:

l_5.0_12

 

Indirect objects are usually positioned after direct ones. The verb position in interrogative sentences is the same as in declarative sentences:

l_5.0_13

 

Contact-induced word order is a characteristic which Romani shares with many other dominated languages. It is primarily rooted in the plurilingualism of adult Roma and the dominance of the primary contact language, i.e. the local majority language. The resulting contact-induced variance in Romani introduced in this section is further discussed in the following description of complex clauses.

 

Complex Clauses

nachobenWhite

The word order in subordinate clauses is generally the same as that of main clauses and displays the (S)VO order described above.

 

Relative Clauses

nachobenWhite

As with other European languages, Romani also uses relative clauses. The most commonly occurring elements introducing relative clauses (“relativiser”) are kaj ‘where’ and so ‘what’.

 

l_5.0_14

 

If the relative clause’s head noun does assume non-subject roles, resumptive pronouns are obligatory. In this function we find kon ‘who’ and savo ‘which’, which correlate with the reference-noun of the main clause.

 

l_5.0_15

 

Verb Complements

nachobenWhite

Complements of epistemic verbs describing independent and real processes and conditions are marked by the factual or epistemic conjunction kaj; modal complements are introduced by the non-factual or modal conjunction te, which occurs as ti in some varieties.

l_5.0_16

 

While te/ti are rarely substituted by loans, kaj is often replaced: In Vlax varieties by the functionally equivalent Romanian or ke; in varieties under Greek influence by the also equivalent Greek oti; in central varieties by the Hungarian hod/hodž/hoď/hot/hoj < hun. hogy.

The conjunction te/ti marks modal and aspectual verb complements as well as direct statements.

 

l_5.0_17

 

In the first example, te marks the complement of the modal verb ‘to want’, in the second one that of the inchoative verb astaren ‘to begin’. The last example is a directive speech act which in English is expressed by the use of the modal verb ‘should’.

 

Adverbial Clauses

nachobenWhite

Generally, adverbial clauses are introduced by semantically specified conjunctions which can be roughly divided into three categories: The first two consist of the conjunctions kaj and te which, as in their function as verb complements, differ with regard to their factuality. The third category comprises all those subordinate conjunctions which are based on interrogatives or which correspond to these. The non-factual te/ti introduces final, conditional and consecutive clauses.

 

l_5.0_18

 

l_5.0_19

 

In contrast, kaj introduces causal clauses:

 

l_5.0_20

 

An example for the third category is the interrogative pronoun kana ‘when’ in its function as a conjunction with temporal, simultaneous meaning:

l_5.0_21

 

Additionally, variety-specific loans which either completely replace the original conjunctions or which occur simultaneously with these; combinations of elements of the three categories with loan conjunctions, prepositions and other particles may also occur. The following table shows an incomplete list of types of subordinate clauses and conjunctions based on purely semantic criteria (Ill.4).


Bibliography

An extended description of the Syntax of Romani is presented in chapter 7 “Syntactic typology” in Yaron Matras (2002) Romani. A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 165-191.